Making Things With Light

When I was a wee lad, I wanted a Lite-Brite something awful. I dreamed of the cool things I would make, and how great it would be to light my creations in a dark room. I was a long while (in kid terms) waiting, but I did finally get one…and, like many things, the reality fell short of the dream. I just couldn’t arouse the creativity I imagined I would. I guess light-up pegs was just never my genre. It still isn’t. I found myself randomly sticking virtual pegs in the board at this site, making what amounts to a multi-colored blob. Ah well. 🙂

Posted in Fun and Pure Drivel | Leave a comment

Beauty and Grace

I like my coffee, and I make sure I get it at least a couple times a day. One of the guys in my office earnestly laid out a proposal once that I get a coffee maker to set up by my desk, so I could get more of it and not run out. He didn’t quite get it – as much as I like the coffee, what I really like is an excuse to get out of the office and break up the afternoon a bit. My regular afternoon coffee break is regular more for that reason than for any caffeine addiction.
So naturally, wherever I go to get my afternoon cuppa, I have a tendency to get to know the people who work there. My current regular stop is a Dunkin’ Donuts a few blocks down the road; when there isn’t a new person at the counter (which happens all too often, I’m afraid), they have my regular coffee ready for me before I say a word. This sometimes greatly impresses the other customers. I rather enjoy the efficiency myself, and I get to stretch my legs, see the sun for a few minutes, and go back to work with a fresh cup in hand.
But before I frequented this Dunkin’ Donuts, there was a little privately owned 7-11 type convenience store only two lots down from my office. It was one of those self serve places, so no chance of having my coffee ready for me…but still, the people who regularly worked the afternoon shift knew me. They greeted me with a friendly smile, and a hello. It was pleasant while the place managed to stay alive. One of the cashiers was a young girl, I’d say seventeen or eighteen, probably just out of high school or perhaps I only got to know her over the summer. She stuck in my mind for two reasons: first, she was kind of shy and quiet, and there is something ironically attention drawing about people who are shy in a public setting; second, she was beautiful. That, of course, got her a whole lot more attention than she was likely very comfortable with, from other customers. But since I was an older guy, and clearly not making any moves on her, she was particularly friendly with me. I was safe, kind of like an older uncle coming to visit. It annoyed the single guys who came there, since she would barely acknowledge them. It amused me that they didn’t get it.
Well, the place was doomed from the start really. Several stores had opened and closed there. The area was flooded with 7-11’s, Quick Checks, and Dunkin’ Donuts. The owner told me the rent was insane, and he wasn’t sure if he could stay open. They lasted about a year. When the place inevitably closed down, I missed the folks I got to know there, but honestly, they slipped from my mind quickly enough. That’s just the way those things go.
Some months went by, then a year. I hadn’t really thought about the place in a while, having adjusted to paying twice as much for my afternoon coffee. Until, one day, I stepped into the Dunkin’ Donuts, and one of the customers cheerfully greeted me, asked how I was doing, etc. It was a young girl, maybe eighteen or nineteen. She was hanging off the arm her boyfriend, wearing tight, tight jeans and a really skimpy blouse that showed a lot of skin. She was kind of pretty, nothing that would have attracted any extra attention. Frankly, the tone of how she was dressed overpowered any of her features – the volume was just too high. I politely greeted her in return, exchanged a few pleasantries, and bemusedly went on my way, wondering who she thought I was. The girl was a stranger to me, so I thought. It wasn’t until I was halfway back to the office that I realized her face was familiar, and that it was the cashier girl from the the old coffee shop that went out of business.
I was stunned. When she worked in the old shop, I had thought she was beautiful. It made no difference to me in the usual way between man and woman, because I was happily married, and she was a kid. But still, you don’t stop noticing such things because you aren’t inclined to act on them. But this new version of her I didn’t even recognize. The beauty was still there somewhere, I’m sure, but it was positively smothered by sexiness.The difference was nothing short of amazing, and, you know, it wasn’t a good one. She was a kid, and you have to expect kids to make some misjudgements as they grow up, but to me this one seemed particularly grievous. Perhaps her boyfriend liked her new look, but to my eyes, it was nothing but a loss.
What provokes someone to toss away a real gift, and trade it for glitter? How can mere sexy compare to true beauty and grace? And why did this particular incident bother me as much as it did? It’s not like this one girl is the only person to have ever fallen for that trap – the world is full of them. You only need to take a stroll in the local shopping mall when school is out to know what I’m talking about. I suppose in a way I started thinking of her like I really was her older uncle…but when push comes to shove, I was just a guy who bought coffee from her. It’s no business of mine, but I can’t help but grieve a little, and hope she comes to her senses before she makes any bigger mistakes.

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Who’s the Insane One?

My first reaction on reading this article was complete horror; once that settled down, I thought it was much like the incident described in my last post: someone let their emotions get the better of them, and they did something extreme as a result. Just in case that link goes away, here is a summary (CNN forbids simply quoting it): Two men had a “traffic altercation.” One of them left the scene, then was alleged to have returned later and shoot the other man four times, in broad daylight, in front of witnesses. The victim died, his infant daughter in his arms, on the scene. The shooter was arrested and charged with first degree murder, and pleaded innocent. He has a history of depression and was being medicated for it; his gun was licensed.
What makes this particular ugly incident different is the factor of mental illness. I am willing to bet that when this goes to trial, that innocent plea will become, “innocent by reason of temporary insanity due to mental illness.”
That would be so wrong, on so many levels.
Lest anyone accuse me of lack of sympathy for mental illness, and specifically depression, let me confess that I have had my own struggles with depression, and have been treated for it. I’ve been to counseling and taken medication and I’m not talking about “feeling down” once in a while, but real clinical depression. So I know a bit of what this fellow was probably going through. And I still say, it’s no excuse, and no court should consider it an excuse.
Our society has done far too much in the way of excusing bad behavior by reason of emotional distress. Most mental illness is not of a physiological origin: it’s usually a matter of scrambled or just plain broken emotional conditioning, most likely due to bad experiences in formative years. If a person is truly so badly damaged that they cannot think straight enough to distinguish between emotional distress and murderous rage, they should not be out on the streets. If a person is being treated for any type of mental illness, they really ought to be where they recognize what is happening to them, and take steps to prevent acting on it. Again, if they can’t do this, they shouldn’t be out in the world, and they certainly shouldn’t be licensed to own a handgun. And if such a person is out on the streets, whoever is treating them should be held just as accountable for their deeds as if they had done it themselves. In a sense, they have, because they should have known what their patient’s limits were, and protected them from stepping beyond them.
That said, I still think a person needs to be judged ultimately on what they do, not what led them to do it. I object strongly to the concept of “hate” crimes for example…murder is murder, assault is assault, vandalism is vandalism; and it matters not at all if it’s because you hate an individual or their race, or if you are just acting out a bad mood. It’s time that we no longer even consider motivations and emotions as a factor in a crime. They are irrelevant; what matters is what was done.
Right away, I know there are those who are balking at that idea, and think I’m taking it too far. But I say that far more people than most realize suffer from various degress of mental illness. But they aren’t “acting crazy” because they were never taught it excused them to do whatever they liked, in any way they liked. Many never even get to the point of even realizing they suffer from mental illness, they just go on with their life and do what they can with what they have to deal with. That was me for many years – I suffered, and lived with my depression for many years. When I felt bad, and there was something I needed to do, I forced myself to do it anyway. Likewise, when I got angry or irritated, I kept my rage in check – as violent as my emotions were inclined to get, I never let myself engage in violence because of it. My point? Many suffer this way, and still they are decent people and do the right thing. Those who honestly cannot need to be protected and helped, and the rest of the world protected against them, so things like this incident never happen.

Posted in Current Events | Leave a comment

Why would you throw your life away?

It’s been all over the news, how they finally caught up to and captured George and Jennifer Hyatte. It comes as no great surprise – the things Mrs. Hyatte allegedly did to break her husband out of prison were nothing less than stupid, if they are truly as presented by various sources. It was inevitable that they get tracked down and caught…I can only say I’m happy to see it didn’t happen with further bloodshed and loss of life. I’ll reserve judgement on Mrs. Hyatte’s intelligence, because, frankly, stupid acts don’t necessarily mean stupidity. But why would anyone even consider such things? Her husband was imprisoned for robbery, but not knowing the details of his criminal history (and being uninclined to look it up), I would venture a guess he would have eventually gotten out, and likely not terribly long from now. Their relationship developed while he was in jail, including their marriage. Why couldn’t it continue that way until he was released? Now he has a prison break on his record, and his wife is facing murder charges. If she is convicted, instead of being together, the couple is almost certainly destined to seperate cells for a long, long time.
If she had thought much about it, Hyatte almost certainly would have realized that this was the least likely way to “be together” she could have thought up. She got a few days with her man, and it may very well be all she will ever get with him for most of the rest of their lives. There is really one one answer I can think of: she let her emotions get the better of her, and she acted on them. Thought and careful consideration had little to do with it.
It’s a sad story, and no way to get your “15 minutes of fame.” But I am willing to bet that although most people would not take the kind of extreme actions Mrs. Hyatte is alleged to have taken, a fair amount of people act on their emotions in a frighteningly similar way.
Let me digress a moment, to tell you a story of long past. When I was a young lad (we are talking the 1960’s here, to put it in context), I was watching a movie with my Dad. One of the characters in the movie killed a man; I don’t recall the plot at all, but I do remember thinking he was justified to kill the person. My Dad commented, almost casually, “Well, he’s going to die now too.” I was nonplussed. I indignantly asked him how he could think that – well sure, it was technically murder, but there was good reason for it! Dad’s answer didn’t help me out at all. “That’s the way it is in the movies. You kill someone, you are going to die. It may be heroic, it may be tragic, but if you aren’t a soldier in battle, and you take a life in the movies, you will pay with your own by the end.” He was right. That character did something noble in the end that got him killed. I began to expect it in movies from then on.
But it’s not how the movies do it today. If you are in love, practically anything is justified: murder, kidnapping, robbery, whatever. If your family is threatened, or those you care about, the same goes. If it’s too late for them, well then, you have a right to vengeance, and practically any heinous deed you pursue to attain it is all right. Sure, there are limits, and it doesn’t always work out well for such folk, but often enough it does. I won’t say whether Hollywood instilled this kind of attitude in us or is simply reflecting it; that’s a “chicken or egg” question that is beyond me. But the attitude exists. It is an emotional conditioning. And, unfortunately, the conditioning amounts to something like this: if I feel strongly enough about something, anything I do about it is the right thing to do.
And if it gets too strong, we might all of us someday find ourselves in a position Mrs. Hyatte is accused of: letting our emotions override our sense. And, like Mrs. Hyatte, we are almost certain to regret it.

Posted in Current Events | Leave a comment

Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself

I found myself facing a few uncommitted hours this weekend, and of course, all the things that I have been procrastinating over during the week came immediately to mind: I have a story in the works that is in dire need of polishing so I can send it off to the publishers; I have several other story ideas begging at being put on paper; and I have one or two novel concepts that could stand some fleshing out. Deftly, and almost unconsciously, I sidestepped each task yet again, found some innane things to distract me, and generally did other things instead. To my credit, I did get some creative work done…I put a new face on my websight, and updated another site I manage that was long overdue for a revamp. But the creative energy needed for that is not as high as that for writing, and frankly, not as important to me. You could just as well say: not as threatening. Because that is what happens to me when I experience what so many call “writer’s block;” I get terrified to be creative in the ways that mean the most to me.
Well, today I also got curious about it. A quick Google search for “fear of creativity” turned up several very good articles on the matter. Fear & Creativity by Linda Dissau, and Fear and creativity by Douglas Eby, are good examples. It doesn’t take any rocket science to figure I’m not the only one who suffers from this kind of thing. And it did get me thinking – how many talented, creative people never get past their fears and actually produce anything?
It saddens me to think about what is lost when that happens, but there isn’t much I can do about others and their fears. But I can overcome my own fears, and with the proper honing, perhaps my talents can make up for it a bit. But even if they do not, for my own sake, I need to do so anyway.

Posted in Ruminations | Leave a comment

Knowing so much, you know nothing at all…

I can’t speak as to the rest of the world, though I expect it’s true of much of the industrialized world; I can say for certain, however, that Americans have a big problem.
Well heck, we have a lot of problems. But the one that keeps impressing me more and more these days relates to the absolute glut of information that is available to us. The Internet, of course, is a fount of such knowledge: what is happening in the world, everywhere in the world, and exactly what everyone who reports on it thinks about it. It’s overwhelming at times, and it defies the ability of anyone to gain more than a cursory familiarity with any particular topic. And therein lies the trouble. We know so much about so many things (or could if we chose to), that it’s next to impossible to truly gain anything resembling expert knowledge in a specific area. But it doesn’t even slow the opinion-making process down, not one bit. We blithely and unstoppably go on and on and on, about things of which we only know a tiny bit.
I am reminded of a mailing I once got in the very beginnnings of the Information Age as we know it. The mailing was in regard to the “new” UPC codes that were being imprinted on merchandise so that cash register scanners could identify and price them. The point of the mailing was that imbedded in every UPC code was the number 666, and that they were the precursor to the Biblical “Mark of the Beast.” The tone of the pamphlet was extremely alarmist. I looked into what the mailing said, and saw how they drew that conclusion. Sure enough, every UPC code had an identical set of lines beginning, middle and end that looked just like the lines that form the numeral six in the same code. But even to my inexpert eyes, it only took a few moments of puzzling over it to realize that these lines only shared a partial congruence to the lines for then number six. I deduced, and later was able to verify, they were simply markers for the scanner to find its place, and had no real relation to the numeral six whatsoever, much less the 666 of the Beast.
So what was the alarm all about? Someone with a very little bit of knowledge (laughably little) looked at some UPC codes, jumped to a conclusion, and essentially went ballistic over that conclusion. This person went through considerable expense to spread this opinion around, and no doubt gained many followers. What’s reall scary is that people still persist in that opinion, even though it has been clearly demonstrated to be an unintended congruence.
A newscast (or a weblog) reports a bit of information about something happening somewhere. Someone without a detailed knowledge of the subject expounds on it, and draws conclusions. Others, who respect this second party, accept those conclusion and proliferate them. It goes on and on, sometimes becoming a disinformational juggernaut. And why does this happen? Because we all believe we know more than we actually do. Just google for the word “hoax,” and you will see just how many people fall for intentional disinformation. But I would like to submit, far, far more fall for unintentional disinformation, and it is far more damaging. I won’t even get into “urban legends,” and the like.
We have been led to believe that we are all experts. That we know “enough” to make judgements that are better than those of people who have studied the issue all their lives. We are completely confident that the President (or our least favorite politician of any ilk) is an idiot, and how “obvious” it is…that people of other ethnic groups in other countries are “sick,” or “backwards,” and all we need to do is educate them, and they will be just like us. Furthermore, once we settle on an opinion, it’s like we marry it – only death will do us part, all facts contrary notwithstanding.
This is nothing but sheer intellectual arrogance, and the sooner we come to terms with our very real intellectual (and opinion making) limits, the better off we will be. We need to accept that we don’t realy know very much about a great many things. We need to accept that there are experts and professionals who know more than we do, and are better capable (even though they slip up sometimes too) than we are at making evaluations based on that knowledge. And, for the sake of all that’s good, we need to tone down the forest of rhetoric that has grown from a few weeds of innuendo and rumor. If we must be experts, let’s truly become experts by focusing on just a few things…and leave the rest for others to become experts on. And then *gasp* to trust them.

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Time keeps on slippin’…into the future…

Today, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is hosting a Time Traveler Convention. Supposedly inspired by a comic strip, this genuine event will feature several speakers from the MIT physics professorial staff. I presume, since the event has garnered national media attention, it will be packed to capacity with gawkers from the present time, hoping an actual time traveler or two might even show up.
I can’t help but be reminded of an observation I have made many, many times: intelligence and common sense, in far too many people, are inversely proportional to each other.
The folks at MIT really ought to know better. If time travel ever becomes a technological possibility, it’s quite obvious that time travelers will not be showing up at this event. First of all, the idea has already been implemented to no effect (Destination Day). Secondly, since there are no verifiable records of any time-travelers ever appearing in our time, it is not in any way reasonable to assume they will be willing or able to show up for a “convention.” If they haven’t shown up elsewhere, they either do not exist, are not permitted to appear in any recordable fashion, or cannot interact with a time period not their own. All this event will accomplish is to gather a group of techno-dreamers together to commisserate over the lack of real time travelers, and burn up some daylight. Oh, and consume the refreshments.
So why exactly would an intelligent person organize such a thing? It’s likely, though no one has come out and said it, that it is to some degree, tongue-in-cheek. We are talking college students here. But why not back down when suddenly it attracted the media limelight? Well, what if a time traveler (or several) does show up?
You see, it’s all about hope. It’s about people disillusioned with harsh reality, and seeing little concrete cause for optimism. Look at what they are offering as suggestions to a time traveler’s proof of legitimacy: “We welcome any sort of proof, but things like a cure for AIDS or cancer, a solution for global poverty, or a cold fusion reactor would be particularly convincing as well as greatly appreciated.”. It’s about wanting a solution that cannot be forseen – a technological deus ex machina. Well, that’s better than despair, and at least they will have an excuse for a party.

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Life, the universe, and everything!

With much fanfare and great anticipation, Douglas Adams’ “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” is hitting the big screen. Fans are excited; they have their towels, and what passes in these parts for an electronic thumb…bring in the flying saucers, and let’s get this show on the road!
I must confess, I’m not going to be among them. Don’t get me wrong, I thought the print work was clever, and it even had a few laugh-out-loud moments. The writing itself is brilliant; irony like a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster. But when I turned the last page, I sat for a few moments to digest it all, and I shrugged. All that brilliance wasted…
You see, Hichhiker’s is, at the core, an ode to nihilism. The protagonist, Arthur Dent, is astonishingly bland, a cipher; his misadventures resonate with an epic feel of cosmic signifigance…and yet, you just can’t bring yourself to care. In his one moment of human glory, love gives him wings, and in the next he has lost it. By the end, when his world winks out of existence, it’s almost a relief, even though all of the planet Earth goes with him. And yet Arthur Dent knows the answer, to life, the universe, and everything…and the answer, according to Douglas Adams, is nothing matters, our very existence is just a figment of someone’s imagination.
So why would I want to see a movie rendition of that? I don’t, really. Life is hard, and often deals out more bitterness and pain than anyone wants to see. Yet living goes on, and people love, and they thrive, and they overcome. They take joy in the challenge, and the thrill of being alive. So what, pray tell, is the attraction in saying it all means nothing? To say that the pain, and the hardship is more real than the love and the joy?
No thanks, and you can keep your fish, too.

Posted in Entertainment | Leave a comment