Shon’ai …

In 1978, DAW published a science-fiction trilogy by CJ Cherryh titled “The Faded Sun,” a tale of an alien race who hired themselves out as mercenaries to other races. Left to themselves, they generally won the battles they fought, and were, in fact, called the most efficient killers in the galaxy. If they had no battles to fight for their employees, they fought with themselves, for no other reason than to make their race, as a whole, stronger. For recreation, they played a game they called “shon’ai.” In this game, they sat in a circle and threw objects in a pattern, clapping out a rhythm as they as the next person caught what was thrown in their direction. The number and type of objects, as well as the complexity of the patterns, varied with the skill of the players; the warriors among them played it with knives. A moment of inattention or carelessness could lead to serious injury or death, and if a person lacked the skill of the others in the game, it would be better for them not to play at all. But it was a game of trust as well as skill, for if a person threw wild it could be as deadly as failing to catch … and the game of shon’ai characterized the heart and soul of their philosophy. They trusted in their skill as far as it went … and they threw … and what happened from there, happened. All aspects of their lives followed this way of thinking, and the game was only an expression of it: they studied, they honed their skills, and they cast their lives forward in the direction they wanted them to go. The rest was fate, and their ability to deal with what came back. Shon’ai.

It seems to me that Cherryh’s tale has something to say to the modern American. We live in a society that rewards those that take chances. It’s not so much a matter of prosperity; you can do well enough in a nine-to-five job, methodically climbing the corporate ladder, or punching the clock. But to our way of thinking, to be happy you have to risk something, you have to dance on the edge, be willing to leap into the unknown. If you count every cost, insist always on safety first, you are considered dull, boring. So people take up extreme sports, they open niche businesses, they quit their day jobs and become singer, actors, poets … whatever. They walk out on bosses that annoy them, and insist they aren’t going to take it anymore. Shon’ai.

But why is that? What exactly is wrong with a dull, unexciting life? If survival was the issue, nothing at all. In fact, it would be preferred. We don’t need excitement to survive. We don’t even really need it to be happy … happiness, for the most part, depends on being satisfied with yourself, and you can get there the slow, dull way. But it’s a lot of work. Taking chances and getting the big payoff … well, that appeals more, because it’s faster, more immediate. So that’s one reason we might like to live on the edge. Who wants to wait until they are 60 to feel like they’ve done something with their life? Why not just do it now? Shon’ai.

But I don’t think it’s the entire reason. The history of American culture, in a vastly simplified view, is that we fled oppression in Europe, founded our colony, and successfully rebelled when the oppression seemed as if it would follow us across the sea. Britain of the colonial days was a place of wide social gaps; the “haves” had it pretty well, and the “have-nots” had next to nothing, and what they did have often was shunted right back to the “haves.” There was also the religious suppression, which American children are taught was the main reason our forefathers came here … but the Pilgrims were likely nearly as oppressive in the religious sense as anyone else. No, the colonists wanted a chance to better themselves without the peerage devouring their efforts and keeping them in place. So they took their chances, and came to America. Shon’ai.

And it’s part of our culture now. An engrained sense that if we let our lives grow fallow, they will be subsumed by those more aggressive than us. It’s the thought that if we are dull, we don’t matter. And the only answer to it is, shon’ai.

Is it the right response to these things? I think it’s neither right nor wrong, it simply exists. There are times when it’s best to sit still, to take no chances. And there are others when it’s best to cast your fate forward, and trust you handle what comes back. Shon’ai.

(For more on CJ Cherryh, see her blog at Wave Without A Shore).

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Harry Potter and the Religious Overreaction

I’ve been turning this particular issue over and over in my head for quite a while. You see, I’m something of a fan of the Harry Potter books; not an enormous, rabid fan, but I confess I enjoy the stories a great deal. But I am also a Bible-believing Christian, and I often find I have to keep my enjoyment of Rowling’s works to myself when around some of my friends. An article on the a BNET site sums many of the problems some Christians have with the books, but the main charge is that the books promote, encourage, or “desensitize” children to the occult.

I have often asked myself, “Have they even read the books?”

Yes, there is magic in the stories, and it is portrayed as a good thing. And yes, the Bible speaks against magic. But the disconnect here is that the magic spoken against in the Bible is real people calling on spirits to aid them in some way. Rowling’s works are fiction. Like any other fictional work, the entire world Harry Potter lives in is made up by the author.  Parts of it resemble the world we live in, but much of it does not. The key point is that when you make up a world in your head, to some degree you make up the rules that operate in it. In Rowling’s world, she made up a rule that human beings can act on things outside their own bodies by some innate ability. In the real world, this is impossible. In the real world people call on higher powers to do such things: either they call on God, or they call on some lesser spirit. What the Bible speaks against is the latter, calling on anything other than God for help. Harry Potter doesn’t do this; his “magical” talents are no more sinister, within the framework of his fictional world, than my ability to type on this blog and present it to the world to see.

Christians don’t seem to have a problem with this in other fictional works. There is magic in the worlds of C. S. Lewis; the difference there is that Lewis has an unabashedly Christian message in his Narnia stories. Peter Pan had magic, and I’ve never seen the book decried on that basis. So do the vast majority of Disney stories, traditional fairy tales, and any number of children’s stories. You see, people recognize them as make-believe … even the children reading them, who are generally far more sophisticated than people give them credit for. They know it’s not real. And such tales are generally not accused of encouraging children to take it as real, and calling on some evil power to grant them such abilities.

The biggest problem, it seems to me, with Rowling’s works is that she chose to use words like “witch” and “warlock”; her characters ride flying brooms and use magic wands; they study things like arithmancy and astrology. Her terminology  sets off alarm bells, because some of those terms are also used in real-world occult circles. But they most definitely do not mean the same thing as the anyone in the real world would mean them. I’m sure if you ask any Wiccan how much similarity a there was between what they believe and what is portrayed in the Harry Potter books, you will get a resounding, “None!” After all, how much could there be? It’s a made-up world, with made-up rules and made-up characters in made-up circumstances.

But the Harry Potter stories are also very much about bravery, devotion to the ones you love, standing up against evil, no matter the personal cost, and caring for others. Those are all good, solid Christian concepts. Sure, there are some things any good Christian will wince at: casual lying and rule breaking are frequently portrayed as “OK.” But you will find that kind of lapse in any work of fiction; an astute reader can seperate philosophies they don’t agree with, and still take something good away. If you strip away the magic and occult-sounding terminology, most Christians would have little trouble with the overall message of Harry Potter. They are simply overreacting to mere elements of the story, and they are reacting so strongly they can see nothing else.

Now I won’t go as far as to say the books are harmless. But what book is? Any author you admire might slip something into a work you don’t like. But you don’t usually throw the book in the trash because of that; much less do you get on a soapbox and denounce it to the world.

So I’m going to go on enjoying Harry Potter. I see no conflict with my fatih, none at all. I recognize the things done in the stories that I don’t agree with; I have enough skill in discernment to not embrace those things just because they are in a book I enjoy. But the magic part means less than nothing to me … it’s a prop, a device to put the story in a more interesting setting. I don’t believe for a minute that any well-balanced person would be led to real life occult activities by it, any more than they would jump out their window hoping Tinkerbell would make them fly. There are some who might do either, but then again, anyone so inclined is going to be caught up in any number of bad things; they won’t need Harry Potter to lead them astray.

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Hold Loosely To Your Dreams

It is a wonderful thing to have a dream: a vision of your life and what you want it to be will get you through hard times, it will encourage you and give you strength; it will help you to rise above what you thought to be your limits and overcome them.

But, contrary to all modern American philosphy might teach, it’s not magic, and it won’t, by virtue of mearly existing, cause you to overcome all things at all times. The world is bigger than any of us, and as miraculous our ability to overcome can sometimes seem to be, there comes a time when it’s just too big, and it will plough us into the ground. Markets crash, illness strikes, loved ones die, and madmen gain power. Often you can overcome, but sometimes you cannot.

Hollywood tells us that love conquers all. It doesn’t. It can give you strength, but it won’t help you if a suicide bomber sets himself off in your bus, or a lost kid brings a gun to school and opens fire on your child. Hollywood also has this mad idea that Rock-n-Roll can conquer just about any problem; well, inspiring music might help you rise above your self-imposed limits, but it’s not going to help you rise above the cold, hard, facts of life.

I don’t mean to be discouraging, or rob anyone’s hopes. But I get mortally weary of all the feel-good advice people shell out when things are going badly. Sometimes you just have to endure. And sometimes you have to go another way.

So hold loosely to your dreams. I think the heart of any successful life philosophy is to be flexible. When the Insurmountable Thing gets in your way, you might not be able to find a way over it or around it. Certainly, you should try, if there is any change of getting to the other side, and grit and determination may just create that way. But you also have to accept that just maybe you will just need to go another direction. Dream those dreams, but be willing to make new ones if you truly must. If you cannot do this, eventually, life is going to crush you.

Posted in Ruminations | Leave a comment

Christmas is for Kids?

It’s Christmas evening as I write: my wife and mother-in-law are in the Family Room reading; we’ve all just topped off a wonder roast tenderloin and artichoke hearts au gratin dinner with some sugar-free chocolate tortes. I napped half the afternoon away, and played computer games the rest of it. Before that, I was scouring the Internet for accessories for the digital recorder my wife gave me. It was a peaceful, relaxing day, and I’m feeling rather comfortable.

I’m not very used to feeling well on Christmas.

When I was a kid, Christmas was great. My brother and I spent the months prior in a lather of anticipation, carefully going through our lists to make sure everyone really understood what we wanted most, and hoping all the extras would show up too. Dad did his best to make certain we got that top item at least; we suffered no delusions of a magical gifting from Santa. In our home, Santa was just a fun make-believe, and we all understood perfectly well that the presents came from Mom and Dad, and a limited budget. And, for the most part, I remember those Christmases very well. We had high, excited expectations, and rarely were any more than mildly disappointed, and the things we were happy about more than offset the things we weren’t so pleased with.

Then, something happened: we got older. Toys and games became clothes and toiletries. I remember quite vividly being super excited one year about a much-anticipated toy, some GI-Joe Headquarters thing (back when GI-Joe was 10″ tall, not those itty-bitty things they have now). I got the toy, all right, but somehow, I wasn’t so thrilled with it. I barely played with the thing; between the wishing and the getting, I had outgrown it. That was the last I even asked for a toy, and after that, somehow, Christmas seemed to lose it’s magic. I tried to celebrate the holiday for its own sake, but I would remember the excitement, and there was only emptiness in its place. Deep down, I wanted to be thrilled again, and it just wasn’t happening. It’s difficult to get too worked up over socks and dress shirts when you are 15.

It didn’t help at all that our family life was not all it could have been. When we were little, things were great; when I was a teen, I would rather be anywhere than home. I know, some of you out there are saying, “well, that’s normal for teenagers,” but I’m not talking about that. In the spirit of the holiday, I’m trying to be kind; take it on faith that my home life at that time was not good, was not normal, was not happy. The bottom line, and the part most pertinent to this discussion, was that lacking the material things, and the young child’s excitement over new toys and games, there was nothing left in Christmas to be excited about. By the time I was 18, I refused to spend Christmas at home. I would find a friend willing to adopt me for the day, and I would go there. It was all the joy I got out of the holiday.

Once I got a place of my own, I thought all that would be behind me forever. I made up my own traditions, I had my own friends and we had our fun and our parties. There was even less in the way of presents and things to get excited about, and by then I understood that all that was over. I was OK with it, too, or so I thought. But each year that passed, I found myself more troubled each Christmas season, and each year I was more depressed on the holiday. I would decorate my tree in a dark mood, and would grow more melancholy each evening as I gazed at it. The tree, more than anything, evoked for me the feeling of Christmas time, and that feeling, for me, had become a feeling of hopes dashed, expectations shattered, and emptiness. I wanted so badly to feel good, and mostly, it just didn’t happen. Some nights I would stare at that tree and just cry, without a clear reason why, and my wife would try in vain to comfort me. My peace came when the season folded back into the new year, but every November, I would start to hope again, for that indefinable something that wasn’t going to come.

So it comes as something of a pleasant surprise to me to have a peaceful, contented Christmas this year. I won’t say it was entirely joyful and without its dark spots, but compared to the last, oh, 30 years, it was wonderful. There were no epiphanies, no dramatic changes. In fact, I had thought with my mother-in-law coming to visit, it was going to be a nightmare of strained politeness and bored attempts to entertain her outside of our normal habits. But it was nothing of the sort – she blended right in with the way we normally live. It was a good visit, and a good holiday.

Which brings me, in my own circuitous way, to  the title of this entry. I’ve heard, many times, the expression, “Christmas is for children.” Usually, it’s said in such a way as to make it very clear that the adults did all they did with little hope of enjoying it very much themselves. They bought the gifts, decorated the house, played the music and baked the cookies so the kids would have fun, and so the kids would be happy and excited. But, honestly, most  have just as much fun doing thoes things for the kids as the kids do partaking of them. The joy might be vicarious, but it’s still a real joy. My parents had this philosophy, but without the vicarious joy part. They did a decent job of making Christmas good for us as kids, but without that underlying joy, there was nothing left when we grew up but a bunch of strained, empty traditions.

Christmas is supposed to be a celebration. It’s a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, who came to save the world from the wrath of God. Even those who don’t believe in Christ understand,  however, that its intended to be a time of festivity and rejoicing. But mostly, it has really become a frenzy of building expectations, and a shower of gifts. Is that really what we want to pass down to the kids, so all they have to look forward to is dissapointment?

No, Christmas is for everyone, just like the gift of Christ was for everyone. It’s a time to celebrate all the good things in our lives, not just that tiny bit of it we can squeeze under the tree.

Posted in Christmas, Ruminations | 1 Comment

Why the Republicans Really Lost in 2006

Despite the dramatic title of this post, I must preface the content with the statement that this is, of course, just my own opinion, based on my own observations. Nonetheless, I think my point is valid, or I wouldn’t bother to share it. The real truth of anything that happens in this world is too complex for any one reason to be the sole factor; but when all the causes add together, some just stand out, and you know they somehow had more weight than many of the rest.

Just about anyone you ask will tell you that the Republican’s lost becasue of the war in Iraq. My own opinion differs. First of all, partisans on either side have not shifted their positions. Those who felt the war was justified, WMD’s or not, still feel it is justified. Those who were squarely against it on Day One are squarely against it today. SUre, there are individuals who have changed their minds, but the bulk of either party remains unchanged. It’s the middle that has shifted. It’s those who were unsure from the start, and were swayed one way or the other; it is those who had reservations, but were persuaded. It’s always the swing vote that counts the most, in any election, and this one is no different.

Though the Democrats won control of both House and Senate, which is by no means insignificant, the margin remains narrow. Neither side has enough to push things through on a strictly partisan basis … it’s the swing vote again that will rule Congress. And handicapped though he may be by Democrats in the legislative branch, President Bush is far from powerless. Ronald Regan had to deal with the same thing, and can anyone say he wasn’t influencial, or that he never got anything done?

So it wasn’t an overwhelming win, and it was a shift in the center that accomplished it. But why? What made those who supported Republican policy two years ago, turn their votes the other way this year?

Arrogance. High-handed, unilateral, We-Are-In-Charge-Here Republican actions that seemed oblivious to the true cares, needs and desires of their constituency, the American People. That’s what did the Republican party in this election.

I knew the party was in trouble the day President Bush made his comment about Trent Lott’s porch in Louisiana. What kind of callous, oblivious comment was that? Trent Lott has the finaancial means to rebuild anywhere, at any time, on any whim; yet thousands in New Orleans struggle to exist, and aren’t at all comforted that some rich guy will be OK. They want to be assured that they will be OK, and couldn’t give a muskrat’s behind what comes of Trent Lott’s porch.

President Bush has a knack for appearing inulated from the American people, and oblivious to what really matters. I have no idea how the man really feels, because somewhere along the line, someone told him he had to put on this ridiculous, patronizing air of superiority; and he clearly took the advice to heart. So did the entire party. They never shared their real reasons for doing things, they told us what they thought we wanted to hear, and they told us what they thought would make us go along with them. It even worked – for a while. But people aren’t as stupid as the Republican leaders seem to want to think they are. You can only blow so much smoke before people start getting out the fans and clearing the air.

And that’s exactly what this election has shown us. America turned on the fans, and started clearing the smoke. Or, if you prefer, they got on the hip waders and started shoveling. Either way you look at it, it can’t be a bad thing overall.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What is the Cure?

Medecins Sans Frontières – Human Ball is a well made, and haunting video that attempts to illustrate the severity of the AIDS crisis in Africa. The issue HIV has been shelved to a back room of public consciousness in the USA; Americans don’t like to think uncomfortable thoughts. But the problem isn’t going to go away, and it isn’t limited to Africa.

But there is no doubt that the crisis has reaced staggering proportions in Africa. Avert.org, speaking of the Sub-Sahara area, says that an estimate of “24.5 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2005 and approximately 2.7 million new infections occurred during that year. In just the past year the epidemic has claimed the lives of an estimated 2 million people in this region.” I don’t think the “human ball” of the video exaggerates the problem; if anything, it understates it. An even scarier picture was presented at the International AIDS Conference in Toronto in August 2006.

But what gets to me is the way a lot of people expect to combat this. What I “hear around” most is that it’s a problem of education. “If people knew the danger, they would use protection, or abstain from sex.” There is a billboard campaign in my area, showing happy faces and stating something like, “They know,” with a little subtitle showing it to refer to HIV testing. As if knowing about it is going to make it go away, or even change the way people live. Well, like many things, it’s not that simple.

Some month a go, NPR interviewed a care worker, who in turn had talked to some African men about HIV AIDS (Sadly, I cannot find the transcript on the NPR site, there are scores on the topic). When he spoke to them about protection, or about being less promiscuous, they basically laughed at him. They considered free sex their one joy in life, and they were willing to risk all the rest rather than give it up. Lack of education is not the problem. Hopelessness, despair, and a crushing cycle of poverty and oppression are. We are speaking of nations where people make their living from the city dump (both consuming discarded food, and selling rich people’s trash); where governmentstake farms away from skilled owners (because they are white) and give them to people who don’t know how to run them, and so trash the nation’s economy; where wars and genocide still rage on. You almost can’t blame them. They think at least they will die happy … that they are going to die, and that not of a comfortable old age, is to them a given.

I would be willing to bet that Africa is not the only place where attitudes like that prevail. The darkest inner cities of America are probably no different. Countless countries in this world we never hear about; how fares it with them and their poor? Despair is a universal thing, and like that human ball, it will grow larger and larger as more are trapped within it. What are we doing about that?

What can we do?

 

Posted in Culture, Current Events | Leave a comment

Don’t Worry, Be Happy!

With all due respect to Bobby MeFerrin’s hit song, somethimes it just isn’t that easy.

I got to thinking on this the other day when I saw a news artcile about a class that helped to re-train people to “think happy” to overcome depression (sadly, I can’t find it again to provide a link). Like any other news article, you had to take it with a grain of salt: the journalist, of course, was not an expert on the topic, and could only report the most superficial aspects of the class; the people interviewed were the ones who benefitted most from the “treatment;” and the subject itself is hugely complex … no one who knows anything at all about depression would be fooled into thinking this would be any kind of breakthrough for everyone that suffered from it. But it’s good that some find it helpful. At least that many can find some relief.

However, I also find it somewhat discouraging. By and large, people just do not understand depression and the peole who suffer from it. Here is a disturbing, and very sad link from a depressed young man that sums it up rather well. His family doesn’t understand, and he feels trapped and lost. I don’t think a “happy class” would help him.

One of the causes of depression (and I emphasize, just one of them), is what the medical community describes as a cognitive disorder. To put it in simplified laymans terms, it’s not being able to think straight about certain things. I believe that everyone on the planet suffers from one degree of cognitive disorder or another. It stems from the way the brain learns things: cause and effect create a pattern, and you remember it. If it repeats enough, your mind and your psyche treat it as established fact. But we don’t always learn things that are completely reflective of reality.

A relatively benign example of this is the way some sportsman get attached to specific clothing, like their lucky socks. The guy wears this pair of socks, and he wins his race, or his game; he doesn’t wear them next time, and he loses. Next time, he happens to be wearing them, and he wins again. On a lark, he wears them next time, and wins. Now, the pattern is set: if he wears his lucky socks, he’s going to win. It becomes something of a self-fulfilling prophecy in that the very act of putting on those socks bolsters his confidence and makes him feel better about his chances to win. It gives him that extra kick that often is the difference between winning and losing. If it goes on, he may truly come to believe it is the socks themselves causing the win. I call that a benign example, because I don’t believe most atheletes with a “lucky” article of clothing really think it’s the clothing; it’s just something to laugh about. But some really do believe it, and that can get very dangerous for their mental health. It’s patently, demonstrably false. Even the times they lose while wearing the item get explained away; they are no longer entirely sane regarding their lucky item.

A far less benign example is paranoia. Something bad happens to a person, and they discover (or perhaps it was obvious all along) that a “friend” caused it deliberately and maliciously. Let’s say this same person grew up in an abusive home, and such betrayals are part of the warp and weft of his character. He may have escaped becoming paranoid if he grew older and found some people that he could genuinely trust, but it didn’t happen. Now, every time he even thinks there is a possibilty of something bad coming down, he immediately starts looking for the person who is causing his trouble. A co-worker he admires neglects to say hello when passing him in the hall: the other may have been preoccupied, or mentally engaged in any number of innocent distractions, but our subject can only think, “uh-oh, I better watch out for so-and-so … he’s plotting something against me.” It’s the pattern his mind set, and it doesn’t help a bit that he was justified in forming the pattern in the first place. Betrayals did happen. But not every suspicious act constitutes such a betrayal, nor is every unpleasant event spring from one. But the paranoid is no longer capable of considering that, not really.

This ties into depression when a person develops an entire set of cognitive disorders that make the suffered feel trapped and hopeless. They might think, “I’m fat, and no one likes me” (no consideration for the fact that quite a few fat people have friends and loves all the same). They may think, “Mom always said I was worthless, and now I lost my job. I guess she was right.” Pehaps they don’t even make the connection anymore to what Mom said … they believe themselves the are worthless, and the loss of a job proves it. There could be any number of reasons they lost that job that have nothing to do with their worth; it may be that they really didn’t measure up to performing the way they needed to … but eiether way, it has no bearing on their actual worth as a person, it just seems that way to them. And nothing they do can break them of the mental habit of looking at themselves this way, so they become depressed.

Which leads me to the whole point of this getting-rather-long entry. Can training on being positive and thinking “happy” help someone stuck in that kind of a rut? Well, it depends on how deep they are in it, and just how many things in their life they are not seeing straight. Some like D. Karrow clearly can be helped, and was helped. But what if an extended depression has actually altered your brain chemistry? Or there is a physilogical factor (like post-partum depression)? Again, it varies on the case and the individual, but there is a good chance that what worked for one person may not work for the next. And, the worst of scenarios, what if the disorder has become so severe, they are incapable of seeing any sort of reason in the matter? What if our paranoid is so paranoid, he is truly convinced that every person that reaches out to help him is reaching out to strike at him in some way? That the “happy class” is really just a ploy to seperate him from his money? How do you deal with that?

There is only one way out: the sufferer has to realize they can’t “see straight” and they have to get help. They need to get to the place where they recognize they must have an outside view of their own lives, or they are never, every going to crawl out of the morass their mind has dropped them in. Sadly, a great many people never get there. Some remain functional, many do not. And some, like my old friends, die of it.

Posted in Ruminations | 2 Comments

Requiescat in Pace

I’ve only recently heard of the deaths of two friends. Neither was a close friend, and I had fallen out of touch with both of them, so I hadn’t heard of either’s passing until well after the fact. As it happens, I heard of both deaths at the same time from yet another friend who I have remained in touch with; she had been looking up some of our old assosiates and so got the news.

The first apparently suffered from a fairly severe form of schizophrenia. He believed he heard voices. Whether due to the stigma, or some reason born of his illness, he kept the knowledge of his suffering to himself, and dealt with it by self-medicating: he drank a lot. Because of both the drinking problem and his own social troubles from the illness, he had some difficulty holding down jobs. When his last job fell through, he contacted his parents to ask them to put him up until he “got back on his feet.” His mom says, when he came to the door, he was exhausted and his skin had taken on a yellow tone. She took him to the doctor, who said he had advanced liver disease, and there was nothing to be done. He died within a few weeks.

The second, I know less details about, but I do know that there was a history of abuse in his family. It has been said the nature of the abuse was sexual, but I have never heard any more than that, nor had it confirmed. His sister committed suicide at the age of 16 (this is going back over 25 years), presumably because of the troubles in the family. When we were in high school, he and I used to have conversations about heaven – he found life so unendurable and depressing, he wanted me to talk to him about something that would cheer him up. I thought he had gotten past it; he married the girl that lived next door to me when I was a kid, and he became a school teacher. I once teased him about how he used to hate school so much, that now he made a career out of it. I thought he had adjusted. So I was shocked to find he had committed suicide. He wasn’t as well adjusted as I thought, and his personal demons caught up to him. He left behind his wife and a three-year-old daughter.

I understand very well how mental illness can dirve a person to self-destruction, and both of these cases are suicides in a sense. And both were needless. I find myself wishing I could have had a talk with either of them before it became too late … I don’t know that it would have made a difference, but I do know neither of them was seeing life or their circumstances very clearly. And that is exactly the nature of mental illness: your mind gets caught up in a process, where you are convinced things are a certain way, and no  evidence can get through to convince you it’s only faulty perception; the eveidence itself is filtered through the faulty thinking, and only an outside source that is trusted has any hope at all of getting through. But of course, if the ill person has isolated themselves, there is very little hope of that. And at the heart of it is generally a deep, personal fear, something the person will avoid at any cost, that keeps them from seeing things any differently.

Though most people don’t go so far as to destroy themselves, I believe this kind of self-deception is very very common. People who “won’t listen to reason;” “that’s just his way, ignore him;” any number of quirky behaviors that we tend to brush off as mere idiosyncracies. Often, they are pretty harmless, but the fact they exist at all tells me there is a problem. It’s somewhat like comparing a cold to a flu. The former is almost always a very minor thing and not to be worried overmuch about, and the latter might range from a miserable and difficult time to something fatal.

All of us suffer from our sniffles and colds, and for some they are even chronic. We may treat the cold, and we might just ride it out. But for a flu, you really ought to get some help.

I wish my friends had gotten that help, but, sadly, it’s too late for them. I can only hope for others who may be feeling that badly, that they will find the help they need.

Posted in Ruminations | 1 Comment

On the “Addictiveness” of Computer Gaming

I just “stumbled” upon this article and felt like I had to make a comment about it: Stop Calling Games Addictive. In summary, the author (Ernest Admas) makes a case for how the computer gaming industry is it’s own worse enemy, by using discriptions like “addictive” to promote games. Adams goes on to make a very convincing argument that computer games are no more “addictive” than any other liesure activity, and generally far less harmful. I particularly like his comparison to kids playing wiffle ball for six hours straight …
As something of an avid gamer myself, it’s always annoyed me when gamers themselves used the term. Maybe they had no particular problem comparing themselves to a drug adict, but I always took exception to it. Having successfully walked away from quite a few games that once occupied hours upon hours of my time, I can say with reasonable confidence that as much as I enjoyed them, I was never addicted. I’ve suffered no withdrawal pangs, and I haven’t had to get any counseling to get over them. I know that isn’t true for everyone, but another point Adams made I think is the most pertinent: someone who is susceptible to truly addictive behaviors is going to pick it up no matter what. And certainly, gaming has to be far less socially damaging than drugs or alchohol.

Posted in Culture | Leave a comment

Wasted on the Young?

There is an expression I heard, many, many years ago; I have oft repeated it myself, mostly after observing a young child bouncing off the walls, or a teenager waxing rhapsodic over plans for the weekend. It goes: "Why is youth wasted on the young?" Young people have such a surfeit of energy and drive, and so little idea how to effectively apply it.

I had the opportunity to apply the adage to my own younger self the other day. I was engaged in some Spring Cleaning, and was going through an old trunk. Amongst other things, I found a stack of photographs, pretty much from the same time period. Though they contained a fair representation of all my friends of the time, and the things we did together, one young lady appeared in several shots that were clearly meant to capture her, with no other consideration in mind.

It might be said that I had a crush on that girl, but it wasn’t strictly true in the way that term is usually used. I liked her; I was very interested in the possibility of a relationship with her; but that could be said of several young ladies at the time. She was just one I focused on more than the others. And I focused on her rather relentlesly, for several years before she decisively rebuffed me and I moved on.

The thing is, I was completely clueless as to how to start a relationship. Most likely my efforts were doomed from the start … she was just a teenager, and I was in my early twenties. Ironically, my wife is that much younger than me, but she was much older when I met her. At this age, I was an old man to this girl, and more than likely, my inexpert attentions drove her away rather more than attracted her. Yet I persisted: wasted youthful energy … wasted youthful drive.

There is another salient expression: "If only I knew then what I knew now …" If that were the case, I would have been content from the start just to be friends with this girl. It’s entirely possible I could have founded a romance with her, if I had been more confident, if I had been more direct, if I had been more patient in some ways and considerably less in others. But that’s all wisdom I have learned since, and no small amount of it from my failures with her. But I also would have recognized that there were several other young ladies who would have loved to make better aquaintance with me. I learned years later, far too late, of these interests. But I was focused too much on just a few, the few who didn’t really want that much to do with me. And the upshot is I might have been far less miserable, and I could have enjoyed my youth so much more, if I only just knew a few things better than I did …

Or would I? That’s what I have been thinking about the most. Both myself and the young lady are happily married now (and not to each other, in case anyone was thinking this is that kind of story). It worked out for us, in the end. And I could not imagine myself being happy with some of the other girls that had an interest in me; yet, if I had known, I would have paid them more attention than I did, and it may not have turned out well. I thought myself wise at the time, but an older wisdom tells me this: when passion knocks at the door, reason often gets locked in the closet. It’s just as well I was a bit clueless.

So is youth really "wasted" on the young?  No, they need all that extra energy simply to survive what their lack of experience puts them through. Older people have the reputation of being less resilient; but I have found that in most cases, they are capable of doing what they must when unusual circumstances come upon them. They simply don’t launch themselves into those unusual situations willy-nilly, because they know better. They have a better idea when to quit, and even when to push forward … and they don’t require a constant flux of emotional energy to get them through the bad choices.

Looking back, I wouldn’t want to go through again what my youthful inexperience once led me to. I probably couldn’t manage it; I don’t have the reserves for that kind of thing. Thankfully, I don’t need them.

Posted in Ruminations | Leave a comment